When choosing sweetened beverages, the debate often centers on sugar-sweetened drinks versus their low-calorie, non-nutritive sweetened (NNS) counterparts. But how do these options actually affect your body? A recent meta-analysis published in Nutrients sheds light on the metabolic and hormonal impacts of these beverages, offering key insights for those looking to make healthier choices.
NNS Beverages Mimic Water’s Metabolic Effects
The analysis, led by Roselyn Zhang and supported by the nonprofit Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS), found that NNS beverages have no significant effect on blood glucose or appetite-related hormones like insulin, GLP-1, and ghrelin when consumed alone or with meals. Their metabolic effects are remarkably similar to water.
This challenges the “sweet uncoupling hypothesis,” which posits that NNS disrupt the body’s ability to associate sweetness with calories, potentially leading to metabolic confusion. According to study author Tauseef Khan, MBBS, PhD, an epidemiologist at the University of Toronto, the findings suggest that NNS beverages don’t confuse the body and are a healthier alternative to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs).
The Downside of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
Unlike NNS drinks, SSBs had a markedly different effect on post-meal glucose and appetite-related hormones. Consuming SSBs led to spikes in glucose, insulin, GLP-1, and GIP levels, indicating a pronounced metabolic response. These findings reaffirm the health risks associated with SSBs, particularly for those managing weight or blood sugar levels.
What the Meta-Analysis Revealed
The researchers analyzed 36 studies involving 472 participants, predominantly healthy adults. They compared four types of beverages:
Single NNS (e.g., aspartame, stevia, sucralose)
Blends of NNS
SSBs (e.g., traditional glucose, sucrose)
Water (control)
The studies evaluated post-meal (postprandial) glucose and hormonal responses under various conditions, including when NNS were consumed alone, mixed with carbohydrates, or shortly before a carbohydrate load.
Across all scenarios, NNS beverages showed metabolic responses similar to water.
The Caveats
While the results are promising for NNS beverages, some limitations exist. The analysis excluded newer research, including studies suggesting minor impacts of certain NNS on the gut microbiome and glucose metabolism. It also didn’t include erythritol, a sugar alcohol linked to potential cardiac risks in recent studies.
According to Duane Mellor, PhD, RD, a dietitian and researcher at Aston University, the findings highlight the role of NNS in reducing sugar intake but should be seen in the broader context of a healthy diet.
A Practical Takeaway
For those looking to cut back on sugar, replacing SSBs with NNS beverages can be a step in the right direction. However, Dr. Khan emphasizes that this doesn’t mean everyone should start drinking diet sodas. Instead, the focus should remain on reducing calorie intake and choosing water whenever possible.
Final Thoughts
This study reinforces the value of non-nutritive sweeteners as a tool for reducing sugar consumption without adverse short-term metabolic effects. While they may not offer additional health benefits beyond calorie reduction, NNS beverages provide a practical alternative to sugar-laden drinks for individuals managing their health.
Ultimately, the choice between NNS beverages and water depends on personal preferences and dietary goals. But one thing is clear: Steering clear of sugary drinks is a smart move.
In Good Health,
Tim Smith MS, RD, LDN
Comments